Wo ist das Flugzeug?
 
Höchst brisante Bilder und Simulationen:
3D-Simulationen des Crashes (alle Seiten bis zum Schluss durchklicken)
http://www.ifrance.fr/silentbutdeadly/
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
http://www.reseauvoltaire.net/
 
http://www.widomaker.com/~skipb/911_DaneReport.html --> "NO PLANE?"
http://www.wtc-terrorattack.com/pentagon__daten.htm 
 
 
Weitere Links:
http://www.widomaker.com/~skipb/911.html
http://oulala.net.free.fr/wikioulala/index1.php
 
Pentagon: Höchst brisante Bilder und Simulationen des Crashes
 
http://www.sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/10/1538140_comment.php
 
unter obigem link finden Sie u.a.: 
SUMMARY 
 
It is physically impossible for all of the plane to have entered the 
crash site, and this is backed by solid mathematical proof. 
 
There is no evidence outside the building of wreckage to account for 
the part of the plane which cannot have entered the crash site. 
 
There is no evidence of identifiable wreckage inside the crash site. 
 
Cremation of the plane was unprecedented in aviation history and 
physically impossible. 
 
Even could such cremation have been possible, it is impossible in the 
context of the modest damage to the wall. 
 
The hole in the back of the third ring cannot be explained by any 
means other than a missile. 
 
Fake wreckage has been designed and planted with the express purpose 
of impersonating the American Airlines colour scheme. 
 
Eyewitness evidence is inconclusive and fabricated eyewitness reports 
have been presented to try to shore up the official story. 
 
Claims that DNA testing identified 63 of the 64 people on board, are 
mutually exclusive with claims that the plane was cremated, and with 
the official line on the WTC victims and the Bali bomb victims. 
 
So if it didn't hit the Pentagon, what happened to AA 77 and the 
passengers? An important question, but it's irrelevant to the 
argument of whether it hit the Pentagon. By way of analogy, imagine a 
murder prosecution where the defence has presented an overwhelmingly 
strong case - more than just reasonable doubt - solid proof that the 
accused cannot possibly have committed the crime. But then the 
prosecution plays it's trump card. 
" But if your client did not commit the crime, then who did? " 
The defence answers that it has no idea. Everyone would agree that a 
guilty verdict on this basis, would be an outrageous lapse of logic. 
Yet this is precisely the same lapse of logic as suggesting that a 
lack of alternative explanation for what happened to the plane and 
the passengers is in any way relevant to the question of whether it 
hit the Pentagon. The government knows what happened. Investigators 
have to work it out bit by bit. The full truth will emerge in time, 
if a methodical, rational, step by step approach is persevered with. 
 
I can see one good reason to cling to the belief that AA 77 hit the 
pentagon. The unshakable faith that the govt would not - could not 
lie to us. A faith so strong that the laws that laws of physics and 
motion suspend themselves in order to maintain it. A faith so strong 
that even the government admitting that it lies cannot overturn it. 
This statement from Solicitor General Olsen. 
 
http://old.smh.com.au/news/0203/20/world/world10.html 
 
[[ "It's easy to imagine an infinite number of situations where the 
government might legitimately give out false information," the 
Solicitor-General, Theodore Olson, told the court on Monday. 
"It's an unfortunate reality that the issuance of incomplete 
information and even misinformation by government may sometimes be 
perceived as necessary to protect vital interests." ]] 
 
Of course, he could be lying ... 
 
 
 
add your comments